From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17861 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2005 02:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17796 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2005 02:49:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2005 02:49:17 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1DAfdj-0005Ut-Ub; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:49:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 02:49:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ben Elliston Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PATCH: fix link error for an all-targets libbfd Message-ID: <20050314024907.GA21076@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ben Elliston , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <4234F899.3010500@au.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4234F899.3010500@au.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:36:09PM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: > When linking GDB against an "all-targets" version of libopcodes and libbfd, > link > errors occur due to calls from opcodes->bfd. Since bfd is a lower level > library, it > should be linked after libopcodes. This patch does just that. Okay for > mainline? > > 2005-03-14 Ben Elliston > > * Makefile.in (CLIBS): Link libbfd after libopcodes, as it is a > more primitive library. Makes sense. This is OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC