From: Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Subject: [RFC] get_compiler_info should cache it's results
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503101557.05919.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi all,
We are trying to use IBM's xlc compiler with the testsuite and have found
severial places that break because of differences if flags. For example, gcc
uses '-shared' but xlc uses '-qmkshrobj' in order to indicate that a shared
object is to be produced.
I have written a tcl proc that will make this easyer. It's kind of like a
special front-end to 'test_compiler_info', which depends on
'get_compiler_info' being run first.
I would like to run get_compiler_info from within this new proc, but that
could result in running it multiple times in a given test.
For this reason, I would like 'get_compiler_info' to cache its resluts by
simply starting the proc with something like:
if [info exists compiler_info] {return 0}
Does anyone see any problems with this?
-=# Paul #=-
Here is the new proc (so far ;-):
proc compile_flags { arg1 {arg2 ""} } {
if {"$arg2" == ""} then {
set list $arg1
} else {
upvar $arg1 lvar
set list $arg2
}
if ![info exists lvar] { set lvar {} }
get_compiler_info not-used
foreach {pat flist} $list {
if {$pat == {default}} {
return [eval $flist]
} elseif {[test_compiler_info $pat]} {
foreach flag $flist {
set lvar "$lvar additional_flags=$flag"
}
set lvar [string trim $lvar]
return $lvar
}
}
return {}
}
I just realized that this ignores the second argument to 'get_compiler_info'
which defaults to 'c' but could be 'c++' (and someday may be ada, fortran,
pascal ...) I guess my 'compile_flags' would need a 'language' argument to
pass to 'get_compiler_info', which could cache it's results with an array
indexed by 'language'.
next reply other threads:[~2005-03-11 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-11 0:01 Paul Gilliam [this message]
2005-03-11 0:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200503101557.05919.pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
--to=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox