From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-38396-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 3579 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2005 22:14:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 3548 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2005 22:13:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2005 22:13:59 -0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j29MCWjg002681;
	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 23:12:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j29MCW7H008612;
	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 23:12:32 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id j29MCWtu008609;
	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 23:12:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 22:14:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200503092212.j29MCWtu008609@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: mark@codesourcery.com
CC: shebs@apple.com, gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org
In-reply-to: <422F4E5A.1060205@codesourcery.com> (message from Mark Mitchell
	on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:28:26 -0800)
Subject: Re: PATCH: Introduce gdb_gettimeofday
References: <200503082329.j28NTaN1029372@sethra.codesourcery.com> <200503091030.j29AULdL019037@jop31.nfra.nl> <422F1DAC.1090702@codesourcery.com> <422F4DB8.6090203@apple.com> <422F4E5A.1060205@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2

   Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:28:26 -0800
   From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>

   Stan Shebs wrote:
   > Mark Mitchell wrote:
   > 
   >> Mark Kettenis wrote:
   >>
   >>> If there indeed is such an effort, did you consider adding
   >>> gettimeofday(2) to libiberty?
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >> No.  Do you prefer that I ask DJ/Ian about that?
   > 
   > 
   > This really does seem like a libiberty kind of thing - it already
   > has the infrastructure for availability testing, plus it becomes
   > available to other tools should they have the need.

Just for the record, I agree with Stan here (guess why I made the
suggestion) so...

   OK, I'll rework and submit there.

...thanks,

Mark