From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13341 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2005 13:43:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13259 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2005 13:43:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2005 13:43:13 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8ezM-00022R-FB; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:43:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:43:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nathan Sidwell Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Paul Brook Subject: Re: [patch] registers beginning with '$' Message-ID: <20050308134308.GD7417@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nathan Sidwell , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Paul Brook References: <420B383D.1020406@codesourcery.com> <20050307225806.GD28725@nevyn.them.org> <422D72C9.1060206@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <422D72C9.1060206@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:39:21AM +0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:32:29AM +0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >>I had the misfortune to port to an architecture where register names > >>all start with a '$' and the pc reg is '$PC'. This patch fixes expression > >>printing of registers so that such names don't result in '$$name' being > >>printed. It fixes register name lookup so that the leading '$' need not > >>be specified (several places strip leading '$' on the name to be looked > >>up). It also makes the register name lookup case insensitive. > >> > >>I also attach testsuite patches to allow $pc or $PC as the pc name. > >> > >>built and tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu, and an unreleased architecture, ok? > > > > > >This one I'm less sure about. If you tell GDB the register names do > >not contain '$', what output is wrong? > > The output from the 'info regs' command will then not have the '$'. Then you should provide gdbarch_print_registers_info; you can make this look however you want on a per-target basis. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC