Re: [RFA] New GDB target iq2000

Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-07T14:05:53Z

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 5 15:20, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:17:45PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Yup. Although the lower-limit for first-line breakpoints may cause
> > > bogus parameter values to be printed. I consider that less a problem
> > > than my program unexpectedly running to completion though. The
> > > problem is that some people tend to think differently and we never
> > > reached consensus about it.
> >
> > Well, it makes sense to me. It's clear that the FRV and submitted
> > iq2000 ports have different heuristics for these two cases; it would be
> > good to cover both of them in common code.
>
> This is rather getting a generic discussion to me. What about the
> iq2000 port itself? Does it make sense to defer iq2000 until after
> the generic problem has been solved?

No, it doesn't. Did you see the patch I sent you on Friday night?