From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10944 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2005 21:12:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10252 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2005 21:12:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net) (199.185.220.223) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 21:12:16 -0000 Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr ([142.179.108.108]) by priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050307211215.QRYQ22572.priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net@takamaka.act-europe.fr>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:12:15 -0700 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D6F6C47DC0; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 13:12:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:12:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Improve "start" command for Ada Message-ID: <20050307211214.GV1750@adacore.com> References: <20041021034759.GP21300@gnat.com> <01c4b72e$Blat.v2.2.2$b14feb80@zahav.net.il> <20041021210951.GZ21300@gnat.com> <20041101194703.GH27334@gnat.com> <16810.33941.938548.637890@localhost.redhat.com> <20041201030309.GE1204@adacore.com> <20050209170543.GE18540@adacore.com> <20050307192951.GP1750@adacore.com> <16940.49472.585572.202096@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16940.49472.585572.202096@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 Elena, Thank you very much. > It would be useful if you pointed to the last version of the patch to > look at. Is this the last one? > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-10/msg00365.html That's correct. Sorry about not pointing at the latest patch, I should have done that. Next time, don't hesitate to ask me to do the search for you, I'll be more than happy to do so. > If so, can you please add a comment about what could be done instead > of calling ada_main_name directly? > Something like what you wrote: Sure, will add the comment and commit. > > > If you want, what we can do is replace the hard-coded call to > > > ada_main_name() by a loop of calls to a new language method, > > > looping on all languages until we find a positive match. That > > > way, the hard wiring to Ada disappears. > > Otherwise ok Thanks a lot! -- Joel