From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26096 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2005 20:17:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26047 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2005 20:17:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 20:17:18 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j27KHIEo010814 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:17:18 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j27KHHn31439 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:17:17 -0500 Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-22.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.22]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j27KHF5s028089 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:17:16 -0500 Received: by cygbert.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2440957D8B; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:17:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:17:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New GDB target iq2000 Message-ID: <20050307201708.GX2839@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050304150129.GF2839@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20050304220104.GA14522@nevyn.them.org> <200503051128.j25BSruw007318@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050305164451.GA8398@nevyn.them.org> <200503051813.j25IDCxt016723@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050305193739.GA13304@nevyn.them.org> <200503052017.j25KHjOK016915@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050305202034.GA15313@nevyn.them.org> <20050307100835.GP2839@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20050307140352.GA4759@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050307140352.GA4759@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 On Mar 7 09:03, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Mar 5 15:20, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:17:45PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Yup. Although the lower-limit for first-line breakpoints may cause > > > > bogus parameter values to be printed. I consider that less a problem > > > > than my program unexpectedly running to completion though. The > > > > problem is that some people tend to think differently and we never > > > > reached consensus about it. > > > > > > Well, it makes sense to me. It's clear that the FRV and submitted > > > iq2000 ports have different heuristics for these two cases; it would be > > > good to cover both of them in common code. > > > > This is rather getting a generic discussion to me. What about the > > iq2000 port itself? Does it make sense to defer iq2000 until after > > the generic problem has been solved? > > No, it doesn't. Did you see the patch I sent you on Friday night? I've tried it and it has two FAILs more than the original version of iq2000_skip_prologue, the two break.exp FAILs we already know: (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: breakpoint small function, optimized file (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: run until breakpoint set at small function, optimized file Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat, Inc.