From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21809 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2005 19:44:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21574 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2005 19:43:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 19:43:51 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8O8t-0004n1-DW; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:43:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Manoj Iyer Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] gdb.base/float.exp and gdb.base/commands.exp patch Message-ID: <20050307194351.GB18170@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Manoj Iyer , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050303002718.GA4915@nevyn.them.org> <20050304162656.GA3334@nevyn.them.org> <20050307165807.GA11032@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 01:26:29PM -0600, Manoj Iyer wrote: > > > If I change the current value of 57 to 82, the test will pass in powerpc > > > but fail on intel. Coz the generated line numbers on intel(57) and > > > PowerPC(82) are different. > > > > That's why you should accept both of them. > > > > > Here is the patch accepting both values. Yes, that's what I meant. If you post a full patch including ChangeLog, I'll approve it. However, please find a way to include the patch that does not wrap lnes and mangle whitespace, first. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC