Re: [RFA] New GDB target iq2000

Corinna Vinschen
2005-03-07T10:08:51Z

On Mar 5 15:20, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:17:45PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Yup. Although the lower-limit for first-line breakpoints may cause
> > bogus parameter values to be printed. I consider that less a problem
> > than my program unexpectedly running to completion though. The
> > problem is that some people tend to think differently and we never
> > reached consensus about it.
>
> Well, it makes sense to me. It's clear that the FRV and submitted
> iq2000 ports have different heuristics for these two cases; it would be
> good to cover both of them in common code.

This is rather getting a generic discussion to me. What about the
iq2000 port itself? Does it make sense to defer iq2000 until after
the generic problem has been solved?

Corinna

--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat, Inc.