From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4273 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2005 14:14:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3965 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2005 14:14:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2005 14:14:36 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1D7DZg-0007tq-2B for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:14:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New GDB target iq2000 Message-ID: <20050304141439.GA30249@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050222114141.GA18314@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20050303173443.GD18681@nevyn.them.org> <20050304094605.GU2839@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050304094605.GU2839@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:46:05AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > What's your exact concern with this function? It's just used inside > of the iq2000 prologue scanner to decide if the scanning loop should > break or continue. > Except for calling iq2000_scan_prologue, a function which is entirely > internal to the iq2000 code and not available through the gdbarch framework. [Of course, I meant the rest of the function, not that bit!] > I'm sorry, but the reason for getting rid of linetable-aware code is > somewhat beyond me. Because _there is nothing architecture specific about what you are doing_. Therefore, most likely, it is either right for all platforms or wrong for this one. I want to understand which. If it's right for all platforms, I'd like it to live in common code so that we can maintain it for all platforms. > I'll happily do something else, as far as it's > available and works, but using skip_prologue_using_sal is really no > option here. Why? Is it the same problem Kevin described? As I wrote, I have successfully used this function on other architectures. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC