From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29733 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2005 17:27:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29701 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2005 17:27:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2005 17:27:12 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1D6u6S-0007MV-JO; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:27:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Gilliam Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Another altivec testsuite patch Message-ID: <20050303172712.GC18681@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Gilliam , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200503021353.50652.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503021353.50652.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:53:50PM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote: > The gcc compiler needs -maltivec to enable altivec support. > > OK to commit? Is this an obvious patch I should have just committed without > asking? Same comments as the other patch: ChangeLog formatting, and GCC specific options. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC