From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] New GDB target iq2000
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 19:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050303121656.1bbf5467@ironwood.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050303175133.GA29272@nevyn.them.org>
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:51:33 -0500
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:46:29AM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:34:43 -0500
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm trying to cut down on the proliferation of linetable-aware code in
> > > tdep files. We've already got skip_prologue_using_sal, which is
> > > similar but not quite the same. Will that work for iq2000? Failing
> > > that, should the new method be used on other targets? There's nothing
> > > iq2000 specific about it.
> >
> > IMO, skip_prologue_using_sal() either needs to be rewritten or deleted.
> > In its present form, it's not very useful.
>
> FWIW, I have a small modification to it which lets it handle two
> consecutive line notes at the same address (it's still in my queue).
> After that, it was quite useful on ARM.
>
> If the generic version is not very useful, let's see what we can do
> about that! Could you elaborate?
I haven't done a recent anaylsis, but I did one a while back. See:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-08/msg00043.html
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-03 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-22 16:35 Corinna Vinschen
2005-03-01 22:13 ` Jim Blandy
2005-03-01 22:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-02 9:08 ` Corinna Vinschen
2005-03-03 17:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-03 17:46 ` Kevin Buettner
2005-03-03 17:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-03 19:17 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2005-03-04 9:46 ` Corinna Vinschen
2005-03-04 14:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-04 15:01 ` Corinna Vinschen
2005-03-04 15:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-04 15:51 ` Corinna Vinschen
2005-03-04 16:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-04 22:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-05 11:29 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-03-05 16:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-05 18:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-03-05 19:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-05 20:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-03-05 20:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-07 10:08 ` Corinna Vinschen
2005-03-07 14:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-07 20:17 ` Corinna Vinschen
2005-03-07 20:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-08 9:00 ` Corinna Vinschen
2005-03-08 13:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-07 21:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-07 21:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-08 9:00 ` Corinna Vinschen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050303121656.1bbf5467@ironwood.lan \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox