Re: MI testsuite improvements

Bob Rossi
2005-02-19T00:06:29Z

On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:27:24PM -0500, Alain Magloire wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok. Wonder if it should be ``set/show tty'', "tty ..." just a wrapper.
> >
> > Ok, I'm going to implement this before even thinking about anything
> > else. Do you care what file the -mi-tty command's go in? or should I
> > create a new file?
> >
> > Also, is there an easy way to use the set/show internally to GDB? This
> > way, as you suggessted, there will be 3 ways to access the inferior's
> > tty device name.
> >
> > - through the MI commands
> > - through the set/show
> > - and you can only set the tty through the 'tty' console command
> > there is no way to get the name. This should probably be
> > depricated ...
> >
> > Internally, they should all use the same data, so, is there an
> > interface to modify the set/show value internally to GDB?
> >
>
> Bob,
> I did not see the original of your proposal, so ..
> Am I correct to assume that the "show" tty will print the master side
> and not the slave or vice versa ...
> Meaning the frontends are interested in the other side of the pipe
> not the tty given by gdb to the inferior.

Hi Alain,

There are 2 different ideas being suggested,
- To create an mi command, that does the same thing as the console
'tty' command, and each of these internally can be wrappers around
some data that can be accessed with GDB's set/show mechanism. For
example,
-mi-set-tty /dev/pts/1 (mi command)
tty /dev/pts/1 (console command)
set tty /dev/pts/1 (set command)

- The second idea was to have GDB internally create a pty. That would
result in a master and slave side. Neither of these are important,
AFAIK, only the slavename (file name of the terminal created,
ie. /dev/pts/1) is important. For example, here is what could
happen
1. The user asks GDB to open a new pty and the name is given back
-mi-create-pty
/dev/pts/1
2. The user asks GDB to use that pty for the inferior
-mi-set-tty /dev/pts/1
3. The user opens /dev/pts/1 in there own program to read the
output of the inferior.
4. The user asks GDB to close the device
-mi-destroy-pty /dev/pts/1

Either way, it will probably be a while before I have time to work on
the second task, since I'm already swamped trying to validate the MI
testsuite with a syntax checker and changing the grammar to match
what GDB actually outputs.

Thanks,
Bob Rossi