From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21873 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2005 20:57:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21653 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 20:56:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 20:56:57 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4Q2M-0003Zc-R2; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:56:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Re: gdb.ada tests broken Message-ID: <20050224205642.GE11751@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050218210459.GA25079@nevyn.them.org> <20050218215522.GA1200@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050218215522.GA1200@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 01:55:22PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > It looks like your changes to use separate subdirectories for each test > > has broken separate-objdir testing. My test runs from this morning > > have: > > Oh no, I'm sorry. I thought I had tested my changes with out-of-source > builds. Thanks for letting me know. > > > Does the test script need to create the output directory? > > Yes, it looks like this would be the best way of fixing the problem. > What do you think of the attached patch? > > 2004-02-18 Joel Brobecker > > * gdb.ada/fixed_points.exp: Create compilation object directory > before running the test. > * gdb.ada/null_record.exp: Likewise. > * gdb.ada/packed_array.exp: Likewise. > * gdb.ada/start.exp: Likewise. > > Tested on x86-linux using both approaches: one out-of-source build, > and one in-tree build. Looks fine to me; please apply. Thanks! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC