From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18614 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2005 20:53:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18572 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 20:53:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 20:53:26 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1D4PzA-0003Xx-Jk; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:53:24 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] gdbserver: Add support for qGetTLSAddr packet Message-ID: <20050224205324.GD11751@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20041206152002.551f8d46.kevinb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041206152002.551f8d46.kevinb@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 03:20:02PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > The patch below adds qGetTLSAddr packet support to gdbserver. > > I wrote this to demonstrate / test the support that I've added on the > GDB side. I suspect some configury tweaking may be needed to test for > the existence of td_thr_tls_get_addr() in libthread_db.c. (If it > doesn't exist, then get_thread_local_addr() should be ifdef'd to return > a 0 status.) > > If it's otherwise okay, I'm willing to make the necessary configury > changes. If it's not okay for some other reason, I'd like to address > that first... This should go through the target vector, instead of adding #ifdefs. Then linux-low.c can handle whether thread-db is present or not. Is this patch still current, or did the protocol evolve since the last posting? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC