Re: [PATCH] new frame code for h8300 target

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:03:07AM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> At Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:02:48 -0500,
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > 
> > [1  <text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (7bit)>]
> > Just FYI, the changes to resurect h8300-tdep.c and h8300.mt are ok (I 
> > see the're already committed).  However the change to resurect 
> > config/h8300/tm-h8300.h isn't - the h8300 is now considered to be a new 
> > architecture and any new architecture is required to be pure multi-arch 
> > (i.e., no tm-*.h file).
> > 
> > Looking forward to patches that fix that.
> > 
> > In the mean time I've committed the attached,
> > Andrew
> 
> I made sure.
> Because a section depending on tm-h8300.h seems to be left, 
> I will correct it.

I guess you mean this patch:

2005-02-16  Yoshinori Sato  <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>

        * remote-e7000.c: unuse TM_FILE defined macro.
        (e7000_fetch_registers)
        (e7000_store_registers)
        (e7000_wait): delete NUM_REALREGS.
        * remote-hms.c: move TM_FILE macro.
        (CCR_REGNO): move define from tm-h8300.h.

I didn't see this patch posted to gdb-patches; please always post
patches to the mailing list before committing them.

Who should be listed as the maintainer for the h8300 port?  It is still
listed as deleted in MAINTAINERS.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC