From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-38100-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8702 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2005 23:35:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8683 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 23:35:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net) (199.185.220.224)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 23:35:14 -0000
Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr ([154.20.104.226])
          by priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <20050215233513.HUUI7683.priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net@takamaka.act-europe.fr>;
          Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:35:13 -0700
Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507)
	id 31D4247DBF; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:35:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 02:18:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Manoj Iyer <manjo@austin.ibm.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Dont skip DW_TAG_member in load_partial_dies()
Message-ID: <20050215233503.GB11771@adacore.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502151434470.29945@lazy> <20050215232018.GB8631@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050215232018.GB8631@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2

> I'm copying this to Elena, since she is the maintainer of the DWARF-2
> reader.  Your patch looks right to me.  In fact, I've been working on
> running the GDB testsuite using ARM's compiler today, and I have a
> patch that looks exactly like this in my working directory :-)

We also found the same sort of problem for Ada, and ended up doing
the same thing. We haven't had time to submit this change yet, as
there were a few things we wanted to thing about before doing so.

Just FYI: Here is the change we've made so far in gdb-6.3.

       if (abbrev->tag == DW_TAG_subprogram
          || abbrev->tag == DW_TAG_variable
          || abbrev->tag == DW_TAG_namespace
+          || abbrev->tag == DW_TAG_enumeration_type
+          || abbrev->tag == DW_TAG_structure_type

-- 
Joel