From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31198 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2005 16:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31002 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2005 16:09:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao07.cox.net) (68.230.240.32) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2005 16:09:53 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20050210160952.YMNA20686.lakermmtao07.cox.net@white>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:09:52 -0500 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzGt8-0007Oz-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:09:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:16:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI testsuite improvements Message-ID: <20050210160954.GA28209@white> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20050210135229.GB28065@white> <420B8026.2060006@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <420B8026.2060006@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 > Please, one change, one patch. Sorry, still a little new to this. > > - Gives the inferior it's own PTY to send output to > > I'm ok with this, as I think you noted elsewhere, this has become the > defacto standard. Would you be interested in documenting this? Sure, where thought? > The change should be applied to just mi-* and not mi2-*, and should only > accept plain text on that PTY. @... output on the PTY should be > rejected ("in theory" so should anything on GDB's pty). Just curious, why are you interested in only applying changes to mi-* and not to mi2-*? Thanks, Bob Rossi