From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27658 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2004 14:57:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27385 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2004 14:57:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Dec 2004 14:57:01 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CjImI-00066f-HY; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:56:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:48:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Dave Korn Cc: "'H. J. Lu'" , binutils@sources.redhat.com, 'GDB' Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix read_leb128 in readelf for 64bit host Message-ID: <20041228145649.GA23403@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Korn , "'H. J. Lu'" , binutils@sources.redhat.com, 'GDB' References: <20041227190130.GA21178@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00450.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 01:13:14PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: > IIRC You don't :-) C99 6.5.7#3... > the C spec says shift amounts >=32 are undefined behaviour, even in the > presence of larger integer types. -- Daniel Jacobowitz