From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8199 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2004 19:32:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8142 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2004 19:32:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2004 19:32:45 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CfNqD-00053y-4Z; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:32:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Recognize 'x' in response to 'p' packet Message-ID: <20041217193240.GA19185@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00403.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 04:12:00PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Ping. > > Jim Blandy writes: > > > 2004-12-02 Jim Blandy > > > > * remote.c (fetch_register_using_p): Recognize 'x's for the value > > of the register as indicating that the register's value is not > > available. I know this came up a bit already, but could you elaborate on why you had to silently provide a value of 0? We do have a defined interface for 'currently not available', though we do not use it well. This isn't support for the xx response, just a workaround. -- Daniel Jacobowitz