Re: [RFA/alpha-osf] another next frame confusion in signal unwinder?

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 475 bytes --]

> (I need to deprecate get frame base).  Can you just tweak this to return 
> get_frame_id().stack_addr before committing.

Sure. Attached is what I ended up checking in.

2004-12-13  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@gnat.com>

        * alpha-osf1-tdep.c (alpha_osf1_sigcontext_addr): Change
        parameter name to make it clear that we already have a next
        frame.  Return the sigcontext from that next frame instead
        of the frame following it.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: osf.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 869 bytes --]

Index: alpha-osf1-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/alpha-osf1-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.18 alpha-osf1-tdep.c
--- alpha-osf1-tdep.c	1 May 2004 15:34:49 -0000	1.18
+++ alpha-osf1-tdep.c	13 Dec 2004 05:04:53 -0000
@@ -35,14 +35,11 @@ alpha_osf1_pc_in_sigtramp (CORE_ADDR pc,
 }
 
 static CORE_ADDR
-alpha_osf1_sigcontext_addr (struct frame_info *frame)
+alpha_osf1_sigcontext_addr (struct frame_info *next_frame)
 {
-  struct frame_info *next_frame = get_next_frame (frame);
+  const struct frame_id next_id = get_frame_id (next_frame);
 
-  if (next_frame != NULL)
-    return (read_memory_integer (get_frame_base (next_frame), 8));
-  else
-    return (read_memory_integer (get_frame_base (frame), 8));
+  return (read_memory_integer (next_id.stack_addr, 8));
 }
 
 static void