From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10620 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2004 23:39:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10602 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2004 23:39:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO arwen.tausq.org) (64.81.244.109) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 2004 23:39:16 -0000 Received: by arwen.tausq.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 36FDF6BE67; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 15:39:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 00:02:00 -0000 From: Randolph Chung To: kettenis@gnu.org Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [COMMIT] Add 64-bit support to hppa-hpux-nat.c Message-ID: <20041211233914.GD29171@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200412112305.iBBN5QST008415@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-GPG: for GPG key, see http://www.tausq.org/gpg.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2 > This adds 64-bit support to hppa-hpux-nat.c. This makes it possible > to use the new inf-ttrace.c for 64-bit HP-UX. It seems to work rather > well for me on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. Of course there are loads of > failures because inferior function calls don't work.. There seems to > be an issue with "hardware" watchpoints however. I'll investigate > that for a bit, and do the final conversion at the end of the coming > week. thanks. I'm working on the inferior function calls problem (posted some RFCs this week). Hope to get that working next week. > Meanwhile, if you want to check this out, simply remove the > hppa*64*-*-hpux11* line from your configure.host file. As you can, > this means that there's only a single HP-UX native configuration left! yay!! > The target side still needs some work though. Currently we can't > build a GDB that supports both 32-bit and 64-bit HP-UX targets, but > the native code should support that just fine. yeah, i've been working on cleaning that up. once the new solib stuff go in it should be better, but it still doesn't work completely yet. i'll pull in your changes and try it out; if things are working in general, is it ok if i enable the new solib support? it's not very extensively tested but the basics seem to be ok. i have a bunch of hppa-hpux-tdep.c changes queued up in my tree. i need to sort those out and submit them. the last time i run the testsuite (on weds) there were about 580 FAILs (vs 620 posted by Joel in October) randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/