From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20894 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2004 16:14:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20873 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2004 16:14:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2004 16:14:43 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cc4SK-0007oa-4H; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:14:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] pb unwinding from pthread_cond_wait on ppc-linux (RFA?) Message-ID: <20041208161420.GA29978@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20041208155633.GX2524@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041208155633.GX2524@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00238.txt.bz2 On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:56:33PM +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I think that the reason that gdb-6.0 worked is a bit related to luck. > Here are the first few instructions of pthread_cond_timedwait(): > > 0x0ffe45b4 : stwu r1,-128(r1) > 0x0ffe45b8 : mflr r8 > 0x0ffe45bc : lis r7,15258 > 0x0ffe45c0 : bl 0xffed01c > 0x0ffe45c4 : stw r8,132(r1) What's the bl actually calling? -- Daniel Jacobowitz