Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Infinite backtraces...
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041207094028.GA2524@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041206071739.GI6359@tausq.org>

Hello Randolph,

> 2004-12-05  Randolph Chung  <tausq@debian.org>
> 
> 	* hppa-tdep.c (hppa_stub_Frame_unwind_cache): Stop unwinding if 
> 	unwinding from a frame with pc == 0.
> 	(hppa_stub_frame_this_id): Likewise.
> 	(hppa_stub_frame_prev_register): Only provide real values if the frame
> 	cache is not NULL.

I haven't tested this patch yet, but it looks pretty good, as it is
close to something that I did on my side. Just a question: What happens
if hppa_stub_frame_prev_register() doesn't set anything?

You added "if (info) then hppa_frame_prev ().". Could it ever happen
that info is NULL?

One thing that I'm thinking is that this will no longer stop the
backtrace once your change to hide the stubs goes in (except in
the very unlikely case when we're inside the initial stub). Is it
still worth including this patch under these conditions?

> Index: hppa-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/hppa-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.185
> diff -u -p -r1.185 hppa-tdep.c
> --- hppa-tdep.c	6 Dec 2004 03:32:26 -0000	1.185
> +++ hppa-tdep.c	6 Dec 2004 07:11:29 -0000
> @@ -2111,10 +2115,13 @@ hppa_stub_frame_unwind_cache (struct fra
>    struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (next_frame);
>    struct hppa_stub_unwind_cache *info;
>    struct unwind_table_entry *u;
>  
>    if (*this_cache)
>      return *this_cache;
>  
> +  if (frame_pc_unwind (next_frame) == 0)
> +    return NULL;
> +
>    info = FRAME_OBSTACK_ZALLOC (struct hppa_stub_unwind_cache);
>    *this_cache = info;
>    info->saved_regs = trad_frame_alloc_saved_regs (next_frame);
> @@ -2149,7 +2164,11 @@ hppa_stub_frame_this_id (struct frame_in
>  {
>    struct hppa_stub_unwind_cache *info
>      = hppa_stub_frame_unwind_cache (next_frame, this_prologue_cache);
> -  *this_id = frame_id_build (info->base, frame_pc_unwind (next_frame));
> +
> +  if (info)
> +    *this_id = frame_id_build (info->base, frame_pc_unwind (next_frame));
> +  else
> +    *this_id = null_frame_id;
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -2161,8 +2180,11 @@ hppa_stub_frame_prev_register (struct fr
>  {
>    struct hppa_stub_unwind_cache *info
>      = hppa_stub_frame_unwind_cache (next_frame, this_prologue_cache);
> -  hppa_frame_prev_register_helper (next_frame, info->saved_regs, regnum,
> -		                   optimizedp, lvalp, addrp, realnump, valuep);
> +
> +  if (info)
> +    hppa_frame_prev_register_helper (next_frame, info->saved_regs, regnum,
> +				     optimizedp, lvalp, addrp, realnump, 
> +				     valuep);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct frame_unwind hppa_stub_frame_unwind = {

-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-07  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-02 22:46 Joel Brobecker
2004-12-02 23:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-03  2:43   ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03  2:57     ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-03  4:53       ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 19:36         ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-03 18:03           ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-03 18:20             ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-03 18:22               ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-06  7:25               ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-07 10:07                 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2004-12-07 16:31                   ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-07 16:37                     ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-07 16:52                       ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-08  1:51                       ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-12 16:36                         ` [commit] Move zero PC check to frame.c; Was: " Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 18:22           ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-06  4:15           ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-07  9:40             ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-03 18:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 18:49   ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-03 19:26     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 20:19       ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-03 21:44         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-12-03 22:16           ` Joel Brobecker
2004-12-03 22:23             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-03 22:25               ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041207094028.GA2524@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=randolph@tausq.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox