From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3988 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2004 17:39:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3946 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2004 17:39:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 2004 17:39:42 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB6HdbDP003508 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:39:42 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB6Hdbr29139; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:39:37 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-35.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.35]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iB6HdaGE010987; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:39:36 -0500 Received: from ironwood.lan (ironwood.lan [192.168.64.8]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.10) with SMTP id iB6HdUUe014364; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:39:30 -0700 Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:53:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: Baurjan Ismagulov Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: i18n, part 2 Message-ID: <20041206103930.6bca4814.kevinb@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20041204195702.GA25306@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> References: <20041204195702.GA25306@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> Organization: Red Hat Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:57:02 +0100 Baurjan Ismagulov wrote: > * aix-thread.c:aix_thread_extra_thread_info() > > "tid %d, %s" doesn't add much context to ", suspended". Besides, > splitting the execution flow with if (tid != PTHDB_INVALID_TID) would > not be identical to the current code. That is why I left the code as > is. Seems reasonable. The string for the %s in the above is supplied by state2str(). I didn't see a patch for annotating the strings in this function. Is this planned for a later phase? Kevin