Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] allow unwinding "past main" for dummy frames
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 03:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041206034013.GA31944@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041206032726.GB6359@tausq.org>

On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 07:27:26PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> On hpux, we push a small bit of code on the stack to implement function
> calls from gdb. The stack trampoline contains a return address that
> points back to the current function. this is needed to properly restore
> the space registers (see hppa_hpux_push_dummy_code in hppa-hpux-tdep.c
> for a much more detailed explanation).  The upshot of all of this is
> that when we do a backtrace from a gdb-called function, a backtrace can
> be prematurely truncated at a dummy frame. Since it doesn't make sense
> anyway to stop unwinding at dummy frames, this patch skips the "main
> function" detection logic for dummy frames. The same logic is already
> there for checking against the entry function a bit farther down in
> get_prev_frame ().
> 
> ok?

Could you explain to me how inside_main_func is returning true for a
dummy frame?

The code is there for inside_entry_func because we used to use the
actual entry point as a location for the dummy frame.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz


  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-06  3:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-06  3:31 Randolph Chung
2004-12-06  3:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-12-06  4:27   ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-06  4:59     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-06  6:22       ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-06 15:35         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-06 16:54           ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-08  3:27           ` Randolph Chung
2004-12-06 14:11       ` Randolph Chung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041206034013.GA31944@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=randolph@tausq.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox