From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5048 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2004 22:31:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5004 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2004 22:30:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2004 22:30:55 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CaLww-00043J-Ou; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 17:30:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 22:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: remote.c: parse thread ID's as unsigned values Message-ID: <20041203223050.GA15548@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <41B0DF1C.2080800@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41B0DF1C.2080800@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:48:12PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > Jim Blandy wrote: > >One month ping. > > Well heck, I'm not the remote.c maintainer, but I'm the thread > maintainer (or one of them). > > Your change certainly seems reasonable to me. Can't think why > we would want thread ids to be sign extended... > > Under the assumption that you've run into a situation where this > is applicable, and the change tests out well, I'll give it the nod. Fine by me too - but if the manual is unclear, Jim, could you clarify it? -- Daniel Jacobowitz