From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2380 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2004 13:57:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2360 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2004 13:57:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2004 13:57:12 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CaDve-0000VS-Vt; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:56:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Schlie Cc: Steven Johnson , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Recognize 'x' in response to 'p' packet Message-ID: <20041203135658.GA1878@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Schlie , Steven Johnson , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <41AFEC78.50107@neurizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:54:30PM -0500, Paul Schlie wrote: > I would have thought that the BFD etc. description of the target machine > would have correctly identified the register set the machine supported. That is not always possible. Targets are strange... -- Daniel Jacobowitz