From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17055 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2004 17:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16942 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2004 17:38:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO arwen.tausq.org) (64.81.244.109) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2004 17:38:47 -0000 Received: by arwen.tausq.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC3C143810; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:38:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:38:00 -0000 From: Randolph Chung To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/RFA] multiarch INSTRUCTION_NULLIFIED Message-ID: <20041130173841.GW6359@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20041123174937.GL9148@tausq.org> <41AA09F8.4020006@gnu.org> <20041128184141.GG6359@tausq.org> <41AA2D08.3030304@gnu.org> <20041129033013.GJ6359@tausq.org> <41AB3C1D.80509@gnu.org> <20041130065620.GT6359@tausq.org> <41AC88B2.5070501@gnu.org> <20041130164401.GV6359@tausq.org> <41ACA6BE.5080603@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41ACA6BE.5080603@gnu.org> X-GPG: for GPG key, see http://www.tausq.org/gpg.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 > >well, first i want to understand the problem. because i'm still not > >yet 100% convinced that step_through_delay will work. simply using the > >"instruction_nullified" method in hppa-tdep as the "step_through_delay" > >method certainly is not working... > > When doing a stepi? step_through_delay certainly won't help when it > comes to doing a backtrace from the nullified instruction. when doing a step. randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/