From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24884 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2004 17:41:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24832 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 17:41:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Nov 2004 17:41:28 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYT36-0006SH-8f; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:41:24 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Randolph Chung Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] fix thread_check test Message-ID: <20041128174123.GA24639@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Randolph Chung , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20041123231559.GV9148@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041123231559.GV9148@tausq.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:15:59PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote: > i don't think this has ever worked for anybody... :) > > The test program name in this test case doesn't match what's in the > testsuite. The regular expression was wrong as well. > > Patch tested on hppa-linux. ok to check in? this should give (almost) > everbody 2 more PASSes on their testsuite results. > > randolph > > > 2004-11-23 Randolph Chung > > testsuite/ > > * gdb.threads/thread_check.exp: Use $srcfile for test program name > instead of "tbug". Fix regexp to work properly with gdb_test. Yes, please check this in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz