From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5247 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2004 17:31:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5233 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2004 17:31:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pippin.tausq.org) (64.81.244.94) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2004 17:31:41 -0000 Received: by pippin.tausq.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66D8CCD89A; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:31:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:31:00 -0000 From: Randolph Chung To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Mark Kettenis Subject: RE: [COMMIT] Cleanup HP-UX 10.20 support such that it builds again Message-ID: <20041122173140.GB9148@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG: for GPG key, see http://www.tausq.org/gpg.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2 > * hppa-hpux-nat.c: New file. Mark, is there any particular reason why we can't fix hppah-nat.c instead of introducing a new file altogether? Is hpux10.20 really so different from hpux11i? if possible I'd like to avoid having so many pa files to maintain :) randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/