[patch] Remove uses of deprecated_registers from hppah-nat.c

["John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>]

The enclosed patch fixes the build problem of gdb on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
due to the removal of deprecated_registers.  It's had a small amount of
real world testing on this port.  I've tried to address the issue of
accessing 64-bit registers in 32-bit chunks as required by the current
code by using regcache_raw_read_part and regcache_raw_write_part.

Ok?

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)

2004-11-20  John David Anglin  <dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>

	* infttrace.h (ttrace_write_reg_64): Add prototype.
	* hppah-nat.c (store_inferior_registers): Fix warning from ambiguous
	expression.  
	(store_inferior_registers): Correct formatting.  Replace uses of
	deprecated_registers with calls to regcache_raw_read,
	regcache_raw_write_part and regcache_raw_read_part.

Index: infttrace.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infttrace.h,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -3 -p -r1.4 infttrace.h
--- infttrace.h	26 May 2004 15:38:40 -0000	1.4
+++ infttrace.h	19 Nov 2004 04:07:38 -0000
@@ -31,5 +31,6 @@ extern int hpux_has_vforked (int pid, in
 extern int hpux_has_execd (int pid, char **execd_pathname);
 extern int hpux_has_syscall_event (int pid, enum target_waitkind *kind,
 				   int *syscall_id);
+extern int ttrace_write_reg_64 (int, CORE_ADDR, CORE_ADDR);
 
 #endif
Index: hppah-nat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/hppah-nat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -3 -p -r1.34 hppah-nat.c
--- hppah-nat.c	5 Oct 2004 21:53:33 -0000	1.34
+++ hppah-nat.c	19 Nov 2004 04:07:40 -0000
@@ -141,11 +141,11 @@ store_inferior_registers (int regno)
 	 layering will not allow us to perform a 64bit register store.
 
 	 What a crock.  */
-      if (regno == HPPA_PCOQ_HEAD_REGNUM || regno == HPPA_PCOQ_TAIL_REGNUM && len == 8)
+      if ((regno == HPPA_PCOQ_HEAD_REGNUM || regno == HPPA_PCOQ_TAIL_REGNUM) && len == 8)
 	{
 	  CORE_ADDR temp;
 
-	  temp = *(CORE_ADDR *)&deprecated_registers[DEPRECATED_REGISTER_BYTE (regno)];
+	  regcache_raw_read (current_regcache, regno, &temp);
 
 	  /* Set the priv level (stored in the low two bits of the PC.  */
 	  temp |= 0x3;
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ store_inferior_registers (int regno)
 
 	  /* If we fail to write the PC, give a true error instead of
 	     just a warning.  */
-	  if (errno != 0)
+          if (errno != 0)
 	    {
 	      char *err = safe_strerror (errno);
 	      char *msg = alloca (strlen (err) + 128);
@@ -170,15 +170,24 @@ store_inferior_registers (int regno)
 	 the high part of IPSW.  What will it take for HP to catch a
 	 clue about building sensible interfaces?  */
      if (regno == HPPA_IPSW_REGNUM && len == 8)
-	*(int *)&deprecated_registers[DEPRECATED_REGISTER_BYTE (regno)] = 0;
+	{
+	  int temp = 0;
+
+	  regcache_raw_write_part (current_regcache, regno, 0,
+				   sizeof (int), &temp);
+	}
 #endif
 
       for (i = 0; i < len; i += sizeof (int))
 	{
+	  int temp;
+
 	  errno = 0;
+	  regcache_raw_read_part (current_regcache, regno, i,
+				  sizeof (int), &temp);
 	  call_ptrace (PT_WUREGS, PIDGET (inferior_ptid),
 	               (PTRACE_ARG3_TYPE) addr + i,
-		       *(int *) &deprecated_registers[DEPRECATED_REGISTER_BYTE (regno) + i]);
+		       temp);
 	  if (errno != 0)
 	    {
 	      /* Warning, not error, in case we are attached; sometimes