From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 949 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2004 17:01:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 920 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2004 17:01:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server7.nfra.nl) (192.87.1.57) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2004 17:01:39 -0000 Received: from juw15.nfra.nl [10.87.8.15] by server7.nfra.nl; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:01:13 +0100 Received: from juw15.nfra.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by juw15.nfra.nl (8.12.2+Sun/8.11.1) with ESMTP id iAIH1RCu026062; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:01:27 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by juw15.nfra.nl (8.12.2+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id iAIH1RPE026059; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:01:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:01:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200411181701.iAIH1RPE026059@juw15.nfra.nl> From: mark Kettenis To: randolph@tausq.org CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20041118012327.GH15714@tausq.org> (message from Randolph Chung on Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:23:27 -0800) Subject: Re: [patch/RFA/hppa] Make the stub identification code smarter References: <20041118012327.GH15714@tausq.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:23:27 -0800 From: Randolph Chung (Mark: for hppabsd, i don't see any stub handling code. if it uses gcc/binutils then i think the same logic for hppa-linux-tdep applies to hppabsd-tdep) AFAIK the BSD's don't use a segmented memory model, and therefore don't use stubs, but I'm not completely sure about that. Now that I think of it, OpenBSD/hppa didn't have shared libraries until very recently. Mark