From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25612 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2004 13:48:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24974 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2004 13:48:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao05.cox.net) (68.230.240.34) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2004 13:48:33 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20041113134830.LYQY2595.lakermmtao05.cox.net@white>; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:48:30 -0500 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CSzCZ-000051-00; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 09:48:31 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 13:48:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Andrew Cagney , alain@qnx.com, nick@nick.uklinux.net, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI handshaking Message-ID: <20041113144830.GA296@white> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Andrew Cagney , alain@qnx.com, nick@nick.uklinux.net, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200411120344.WAA24018@smtp.ott.qnx.com> <41953FDA.7030708@gnu.org> <01c4c95e$Blat.v2.2.2$f59e0820@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c4c95e$Blat.v2.2.2$f59e0820@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:57:30 -0500 > > From: Andrew Cagney > > Cc: Bob Rossi , Nick Roberts , > > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > > > =mi-handshake,versions=[mi1,mi2,mi3],stable=[mi2] > > > > Yes, thanks for the correction with ``=''. But not > > ``versions=[mi1,mi2,mi3]'' that's too much and misleading information. > > > > I think the objective here needs to be to provide as much information as > > possible about what version of GDB and MI is running. Hence the: > > > > version="mi2" > > > > (where hopefully VERSION version is a member of STABLE :-) > > We've been through this discussion, and the only suggestion that > brought a consensus was to print all the supported MI versions, not > just one. Let's not reopen that discussion again, even if the result > looks ``too much and misleading''. (Why ``misleading'', btw?) Yeah, anyways it doesn't really matter for now. GDB only supports one version, and I have a feeling it will stay that way for a long time. Bob Rossi