From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9297 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2004 20:32:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9271 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2004 20:32:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU) (128.32.153.227) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2004 20:32:28 -0000 Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.7/8.12.7/3.141592645) with ESMTP id iABKWQmL015981; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:32:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (hilfingr@localhost) by tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) with ESMTP id iABKWPC0015978; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:32:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200411112032.iABKWPC0015978@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Some testcases for long long bitfields Reply-To: Hilfinger@CS.Berkeley.EDU In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:07:58 -0500. <4193C69E.9050403@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <15974.1100205145.1@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:32:00 -0000 From: Paul Hilfinger X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 Andrew, Thanks for the comments. I'll address them presently. If you have free time on your hands (:->) you might want to turn your gimlet eye on bitfields.exp, from which I stole most of this. Paul Hilfinger