From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10461 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2004 21:01:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10356 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2004 21:01:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.142) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2004 21:01:12 -0000 Received: by us.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E227CB2F6; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:58:41 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Gilliam Reply-To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] New test for set backtrace related functionality Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200410141539.22560.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <41798044.nailDG51QLXJD@mindspring.com> <200410261151.42140.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200410261151.42140.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Chastain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411081258.41749.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2 Michael, I'ts been two weeks. Please OK this so I can look good on my review 8-) -=# Paul #=- On Tuesday 26 October 2004 11:51, Paul Gilliam wrote: > Michael, > > Here is the latest version of the patch. Sorry I didn't get it turned > around yesterday. > > I make a little chage to your suggested test names: > > On Friday 22 October 2004 14:48, Michael Chastain wrote: > > How about: > > > > set test "set backtrace" > > set test "full backtrace, ignore extra" > > set test "full backtrace, exact" > > set test "partial backtrace, with argument" > > set test "partial backtrace, with limit" > > set test "partial backtrace, via argument" > set test "partial backtrace, via limit" > > I think "via" is better here than "with", but "using" would work well also. > > I have attached the new files. > > -=# Paul #=-