From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26603 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2004 21:34:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26586 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2004 21:34:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2004 21:34:11 -0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by walton.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iA7LY7eO025174; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 22:34:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iA7LY7et065080; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 22:34:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id iA7LY2mQ065075; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 22:34:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 21:34:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200411072134.iA7LY2mQ065075@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org In-reply-to: <20041107211842.GA8812@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:18:43 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa] Attach vsyscall support for GNU/Linux References: <20041024185345.GB22700@nevyn.them.org> <200410242054.i9OKsjnl028328@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041024231636.GA21927@nevyn.them.org> <200410252212.i9PMCQhJ031724@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041101161552.GA26993@nevyn.them.org> <200411012045.iA1KjKDg000415@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041105234229.GA6082@nevyn.them.org> <200411071735.iA7HZimk032505@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20041107211842.GA8812@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2 Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:18:43 -0500 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Here's this bit, as committed - let me know if I didn't get it quite the way you wanted. Thanks for the observation about just using one sniffer; it looks much cleaner now. That's exactly what I meant. Thanks! Please go ahead and commit the other bit too. Cheers, Mark