From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28067 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2004 05:12:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28059 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2004 05:12:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2004 05:12:58 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1COUUz-0002ua-V7; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:12:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 05:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit] Add add_setshow_enum_cmd, use in mips Message-ID: <20041101051257.GA11134@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4183BD22.3090905@gnu.org> <01c4bed6$Blat.v2.2.2$fa231b20@zahav.net.il> <41856ECA.2060701@gnu.org> <01c4bfcd$Blat.v2.2.2$299ef260@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c4bfcd$Blat.v2.2.2$299ef260@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:41:12AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:01:30 -0500 > > From: Andrew Cagney > > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > > The missing add_setshow_enum_cmd both goes with, and is consistent, with > > the existing add_setshow zinteger, boolean, auto_boolean, filename, > > string, uinteger command functions > > I didn't say the patch was unreasonable, just that it should have been > an RFA, since it is by no means ``obvious''. Why? There is no maintainer for this area, and Andrew is entitled to approve patches himself, so an RFA (request for approval) seems unnecessary. -- Daniel Jacobowitz