From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: cagney@gnu.org
Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [COMMIT] OpenBSD/mips64 target and native support
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410311945.i9VJjMoG002666@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4185314C.7020307@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:39:08 -0500)
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:39:08 -0500
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>>> This part:
>>>
>>>
>>>> +DEPRECATED_TM_FILE= tm-nbsd.h
>>>
>>>
>>> is no longer acceptable.
The situtation we have here is identical to that we encountered when we
first made it a requirement that not just new architectures, but also
extensions to exsting architectures, had to be multi-arch. We set the
standard and then helped developers exceed it.
Our only mistake was to "blink" when it came to the solib problem.
We've been "blinking" for too many years now.
So should I just commit the attached to get things moving?
IMHO, getting the solib h thingy fixed simply isn't top priority.
There are more important issues in GDB that deserve my attention.
Scaring away contributors by making unreasonable demands isn't a
sensible thing to do.
Mark
Index: ChangeLog
from Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* config/i386/linux.mt (DEPRECATED_TM_FILE): Remove.
Index: config/i386/linux.mt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/config/i386/linux.mt,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 linux.mt
--- config/i386/linux.mt 13 Sep 2004 20:55:39 -0000 1.10
+++ config/i386/linux.mt 31 Oct 2004 19:21:53 -0000
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
# Target: Intel 386 running GNU/Linux
TDEPFILES= i386-tdep.o i386-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o i387-tdep.o \
solib.o solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o
-DEPRECATED_TM_FILE= tm-linux.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-31 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-23 12:16 Mark Kettenis
2004-10-25 15:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-25 15:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-25 19:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-31 18:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-31 19:45 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-10-31 20:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-31 22:28 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-01 0:48 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410311945.i9VJjMoG002666@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox