From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1856 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2004 13:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1838 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2004 13:33:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2004 13:33:37 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CNAPF-00005a-D2; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:33:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jeff Johnston Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Watchpoints per thread patch Message-ID: <20041028133333.GA32744@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Johnston , Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4175A9C9.8040300@redhat.com> <41769FF3.7010801@gnu.org> <20041020173035.GA26622@nevyn.them.org> <418022DE.204@redhat.com> <20041027224155.GA3485@nevyn.them.org> <41802C79.7040103@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41802C79.7040103@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:17:13PM -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Were you thinking of add_thread()? If so, we would have to move the calls > to add_thread so they never occur before an attach because the low-level > observers will need the thread already attached. Oh, that's a good point. Do you think that's a reasonable change to make? -- Daniel Jacobowitz