From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31982 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2004 00:52:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31957 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2004 00:52:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO capitol.mail.pas.earthlink.net) (207.217.120.180) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2004 00:52:00 -0000 Received: from ip216-26-76-19.dsl.du.teleport.com ([216.26.76.19] helo=stray.canids) by capitol.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1CMyWD-0004zZ-00; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:51:57 -0700 Received: from stray.canids (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by stray.canids (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259D34E8F0A; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:51:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Felix Lee To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: backtrace changes current source location References: <20041026075115.4A2C354AAB5@stray.canids> <20041026132924.GA26886@nevyn.them.org> <20041026150127.6ED3E54AAB5@stray.canids> <417FDC11.7060700@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <417FDC11.7060700@gnu.org> on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:34:09 EDT from Andrew Cagney Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:52:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20041028005157.259D34E8F0A@stray.canids> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney : > (Don't forget to consider the error case - if an error is thrown a > restore would be lost) is it worth setting up an unwind handler for that? I couldn't think of a case where an error would be usual, and for unusual errors, all bets are off. > Thanks for remembering this. However, as a separate test, it should be > in a separate file. how about putting the test in list.exp? or is the idea to move toward one test per file? --