From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21630 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2004 04:08:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21620 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2004 04:08:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hall.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.60) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Oct 2004 04:08:10 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1CKUFD-0007jN-00; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:08:07 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id E31BC4B359; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:08:38 -0400 (EDT) To: brobecker@gnat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite/ada] Refine expected output of start command Message-Id: <20041021040838.E31BC4B359@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 04:08:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 >From gdb-patches-return-36411-mec.gnu=mindspring.com@sources.redhat.com Wed Oct 20 23:43:05 2004 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:49:15 -0700 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: [RFA/testsuite/ada] Refine expected output of start command Approved. I don't know Ada so I'm at the mercy of people who do. Your explanation is persuasive though. It's okay if improving a test changes the result from a bad PASS to a good FAIL. === 2004-10-20 Joel Brobecker * gdb.ada/null_record.exp: Check where we stopped after sending the start command, instead of where the associated temporary breakpoint was inserted.