From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14228 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2004 17:30:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14221 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 17:30:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 17:30:38 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKKIF-0008UU-Vc; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:30:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Jeff Johnston , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Watchpoints per thread patch Message-ID: <20041020173035.GA26622@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Jeff Johnston , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4175A9C9.8040300@redhat.com> <41769FF3.7010801@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41769FF3.7010801@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:27:15PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > the underlying target (ia64-linux-nat, ...) can locally override the > method and handle the problem. The code's the same, but how it is wired > up is different > > Sound reasonable to all? I think that sounds pretty good. Hopefully the changes involved will be pretty small, since I imagine that most GNU/Linux targets with hardware watchpoints will want it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz