From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26320 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2004 15:24:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26297 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 15:24:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 15:24:42 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 89FC647D9C; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:24:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdbserver build broken on amd64-linux Message-ID: <20041020152441.GD3527@gnat.com> References: <20041020053216.GB3527@gnat.com> <20041020142645.GA24010@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041020142645.GA24010@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00337.txt.bz2 > How about ths instead? > > #ifndef ARCH_GET_FS > #define ARCH_SET_GS 0x1001 > #define ARCH_SET_FS 0x1002 > #define ARCH_GET_FS 0x1003 > #define ARCH_GET_GS 0x1004 > #endif Yes, that should work too. I'm curious as to why these macros are not defined for me, or said differently how it is that they are defined for others (assuming others can build this code on amd64-linux unmodified). -- Joel