From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18750 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2004 13:23:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18703 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2004 13:23:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2004 13:23:16 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CJtxL-0005O3-Iq; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:23:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Michael Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc/NEWS] GDB works with GCC -feliminate-dwarf2-dups. Message-ID: <20041019132315.GA20657@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Michael Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4172B5F4.nailMEV1154GO@mindspring.com> <20041017183143.GA22628@nevyn.them.org> <4172BF74.nailMK41WRWF5@mindspring.com> <20041017191337.GA23601@nevyn.them.org> <4172D1FF.nailMO5211TI7@mindspring.com> <01c4b4cf$Blat.v2.2.2$1a0e6f00@zahav.net.il> <417423FA.nailP2L12S6AW@mindspring.com> <01c4b595$Blat.v2.2.2$2312b680@zahav.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01c4b595$Blat.v2.2.2$2312b680@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:34:59AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I won't start a dispute out of a 5-liner, so go ahead and commit your > version. However, at the very least replace "commercial" with > "proprietary". This is a distinction the FSF asks us to make (there's > nothing to prevent a free software project from going commercial as > long at is stays GPL-compliant). Either phrasing is fine with me. But, for the record, I chose the word deliberately; I don't know of any other free compilers which produce it, but I do know of compilers which are both commercial and proprietary which do so. "non-GCC" would be just as accurate a bucket. -- Daniel Jacobowitz