From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15041 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2004 23:56:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15028 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2004 23:56:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2004 23:56:03 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 9C2B047D9A; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:56:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 23:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: David Lecomber Cc: dan@debian.org, patches Subject: Re: [commit] Use full paths for "info sources" Message-ID: <20041016235603.GC20779@gnat.com> References: <1095776238.14044.8.camel@elmo.priv.wark.uk.streamline-computing.com> <20040921153013.GA15014@nevyn.them.org> <20040924211628.GC11798@gnat.com> <1097605852.9994.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041013232403.GU1375@gnat.com> <1097712892.11117.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1097712892.11117.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00296.txt.bz2 > > I haven't reviewed the entire thread yet. Was this something really > > bad. Or is it just duplication we get in the output, and that's it? > > One problem is that things appear in the info sources, and info source, > and in the stack traces, with different paths. So once you've got your > definitive path for a file, you then see it referred to in a different > way when you start using it. Work-roundable for the user I guess, but > less than ideal. I just had a look. I think I have a fix for it, but I might just have opened a can of worms... In any case, I'm working on it. -- Joel