From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12708 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2004 19:07:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12513 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 19:07:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 19:07:20 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CHoT1-0007TQ-DK; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:07:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:07:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] dwarf2 intercu test Message-ID: <20041013190718.GA27855@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20041012191144.GA21895@nevyn.them.org> <416D47EB.nailB6114LO3@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <416D47EB.nailB6114LO3@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:21:15AM -0400, Michael Chastain wrote: > > It fails for GDB 6.1, and passes for HEAD. > > Probably a typo there. For me, there are two FAIL results with > gdb 6.2.1, and all PASS with gdb HEAD. No typo - I don't have GDB 6.2.1 built, so I ran it with GDB 6.1 (my system GDB). > But it looks fine. Approved. Thanks! Checked in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz