From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9846 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2004 21:37:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9837 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 21:37:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.142) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 21:37:48 -0000 Received: by us.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65E841118D; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:35:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Gilliam Reply-To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Include the LWP in thread-db's PTIDs Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:37:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20041010213630.GA8218@nevyn.them.org> <416AA623.7080304@gnu.org> <200410111940.i9BJeQU2001164@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200410111940.i9BJeQU2001164@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410131435.23303.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2 On Monday 11 October 2004 12:40, Mark Kettenis wrote: > I think assuming 1:1 threads is fair enough. But Daniel, if you're > going to do that, I'd like to ask you to rename thread-db.c into > linux-thread.c or something like that. > How about one2one-thread.c? -=# Paul Gilliam #=-