Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] Dwarf2 testsuite
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 22:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041008221614.GA1584@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4166FAD8.9090301@redhat.com>

On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 01:38:48PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >This patch adds a sample test for DWARF-2 unit testing.  It requires:
> >  - gas, for the .uleb128/.sleb128 directives among other things
> >  - ELF; it could probably be made to work on non-ELF dwarf2 systems
> >    but I don't know what changes would be necessary.  Perhaps those
> >    should be tested separately.
> >
> >I haven't tried, but I wrote it with the intent that it would not care 
> >about
> >the host beyond that; it should run on 64-bit ELF targets OK.
> >
> >It just includes a trivial test containing hand-written DIEs for a single
> >CU.  This one file I annotated exhaustively, and let me tell you, it was
> >exhausting; for future tests I will allow them to be self-documenting (the
> >comments don't say anything that compiling the file and running readelf
> >won't tell you).
> >
> >The test itself just demonstrates that the dwarf2 reader isn't completely
> >busted.  But more interesting tests could be easily added.
> >
> >Look OK?  Suggestions?
> >
> 
> Looks exhausting.  I'm glad you're doing this.
> 
> Dan, what would you think about (somebody) writing a tool
> that could read some sort of description (eg. what's in
> your comments), and generate the dwarf2 recs?  Sort of a
> simple compiler that accepts, in effect, the dwarf2 spec
> as input?  Would that be, perhaps, less of an effort than
> writing a sufficiently large subset of tests by hand?

<chanting> Do it!  Do it!  Do it! </chanting>

Does that answer your question?  Yes, it would absolutely be less
effort.  It would be a little tricky.  Done properly could
encapsulate most of the time-consuming bits - in particular, it could
handle testing both 32-bit and 64-bit mode, and it could automate (for
the common cases at least) the nasty bits of .debug_abbrev and
.debug_line.

I'm not sure what it would output.  Maybe a text file full of .byte
directives, so that we could #include it from an asm file with the
labels referenced in it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz


      reply	other threads:[~2004-10-08 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-08 18:35 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-08 19:45 ` Michael Chastain
2004-10-08 20:25   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-11  3:50     ` Michael Chastain
2004-10-12 14:42       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-12 14:44     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-12 15:54       ` Michael Chastain
2004-10-08 20:38 ` Michael Snyder
2004-10-08 22:16   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041008221614.GA1584@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox