From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2221 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2004 19:52:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2210 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2004 19:52:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2004 19:52:24 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CEvMF-00068Y-V7; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 15:52:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Fix remote debugging Message-ID: <20041005195223.GA23462@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20041004200122.GA30774@nevyn.them.org> <4162FAB3.4010603@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4162FAB3.4010603@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:49:07PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >Your recent patch made it mandatory for any target which implements > >to_xfer_partial to support TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY, i.e. its > >to_xfer_memory will be ignored. remote.c doesn't meet this new > >requirement. I didn't check all the other targets with _partial > >methods. > > > >OK? Tested on i386-pc-linux-gnu using gdbserver. Brings test results > >from unspeakable back to merely disappointing. > > There's no gdbserver.exp unit test, wasn't one going to be added? (the > patch is ok) I haven't had time to figure out how to do it yet. A DWARF testsuite is higher on my priorities. Checked in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz